The late Milton Glaser on Woodstock, N.Y.


I WAS SAD to read of the passing of the great Milton Glaser, even if he had reached the august age of 91. He was gracious enough to grant me an interview for my Woodstock/Bearsville book Small Town Talk, so I thought I’d post the salient quotes I extracted from our conversation back in 2013. He was a lovely man and had some valuable insider insights into that “strange man” Albert Grossman

“Woodstock always had a kind of modest cultural history. It had a population of modest artists, some more credible than others. In those days the artist colony was a glamorous thing, but only at a distance. As you got up close it was just like any other poor town in the Catskills.

“We started going up there because it was a cheap place to go and because there were occasional art galleries and things to see. We first went up about fifty years ago, mid-to-late ’50s. We stayed with friends who’d bought a barn, and we used to sleep in the corncrib. It was always an attractive place that never quite got chic, for reasons that we didn’t fully understand. It was the kind of anti-Hamptons. Certain people at the extremities of the arts felt an affinity for the place and would go up there, but it hadn’t quite coalesced into anything discernible.

“We used to drive up in a little yellow Volkswagen. We started renting over the summer for a couple of years, and then one year I tried to see if we could operate the studio from Woodstock. Push-Pen Studios. There’s even a picture of us somewhere. And then a year or so later we found our present house on Lewis Hollow Road, which we bought for $18,000. And it came with 80 acres of land, but the land was considered so worthless in those days. It had belonged to an artist named Bruno Zinn [Zimm?] The area was known for having rattlesnakes, so no one wanted to be up there. Friends would come up from the city. Most of our friends were weekenders. This kid in the local supermarket told Shirley about the Striebel house, and we didn’t know a single person that had $50,000 except for Albert [Grossman].

“Albert had seen or heard of my work, and he called and asked if I would do some work for him. The first thing he did was ask us if we would like to go to a concert in a club. He had just spoken to a group that he was considering putting together, and he wanted our opinion. So Shirley and I went to the Café Wha?, I think, and it was Peter Paul & Mary’s first appearance, and shortly after he signed them as a group. Peter moved into the same building where we lived on West 67th Street. And then we started working regularly for Albert. We got to know The Band and Janis.

“Albert was a strange man, but I genuinely liked him and we had a very intimate relationship compared to most professional relationships. He was a curious mixture of aggression and shyness. In some cases he was so withdrawn, and in other cases he would just bully people into submission. Sometimes when people come from Chicago they feel very intimated by New York, and with him there was certainly a kind of estrangement. He was not adept at social occasions, even though he was always in the midst of hundreds of people and organizing things.

“Shirley also heard about the house that Dylan bought on Camelot Road, so you might say she’s totally responsible for everything that happened to Woodstock.

“We drove up to Woodstock on the night the festival began, and there were at least fifty people walking up Mill Hill Road looking for the festival site.

“Albert started the Bear, which is still one of the few decent places to eat anywhere in that area.

“It’s interesting that the town never became self-conscious about the musical component, or about the fact that so many famous musicians of the time were there either regularly or from time to time. There was no sort of cool place to be, no gathering spots, unlike in the Hamptons. The town is very dissipated. You can live in that town without knowing anyone. There’s no social scene of any kind, no group of cool people. There were all these artists, but they always lived at the extremities and they were there because it was so cheap and they were not part of regular events that were occurring. There was no sense of a weekend calendar like you had in the Hamptons. That’s what has saved the place for us – that there’s nothing to see and nothing to do! It was a place where people could do their work, as opposed to benefiting from your notoriety and money wanting to be part of a visible community for whatever egocentric or financial gain there was. Also, there was no class distinction. If you had money it was irrelevant because there was no way to display it. If you had a big car you kept it outside like everybody else. Most people went there to disappear, and that’s why we went there. Something preserved that town so that it was never really transformed.

“Albert was essentially reclusive. He came up to disappear too. Every once in a while, he used the house to entertain, but mostly he used it to isolate himself. Of course, he was carrying out some business, because a lot of people like The Band were up there.

“John Court would often come by this office with something Albert had given him to bring.

“I was always very touched by Albert, partly because he always had this reputation of being a tough guy and a big power in the music world, whereas on a personal level he was always very kind and sweet to me.

“I did albums after albums, and some nice work that I’m pleased with.

“Albert had no direct reason why he would be interested in Bearsville, outside of the fact that people often called him bear-like. The fact that the Bear still exists, and that the theatre was built, is really impressive. As a place, neither the restaurant nor the theatre are really appreciated.

“There was a period in the artistic community where hard drinking and that kind of ruffian-like artist behavior existed, but it sort of disappeared.

“There’s still an unspoiled bucolic sweetness about the place. We always compare it to our friends in the Hamptons who are busy all the time and where the idea of a protective enclave doesn’t exist anymore. I think that’s one of the reasons Albert went there. He hated that kind of social activity, it wasn’t natural for him. And he was not impressed by people who had a lot of money.”

The RBP Podcast

In last week’s episode of the Rock’s Backpages podcast, we welcomed special guest James Fox, author of 1982’s bestselling White Mischief and the man who, 10 years ago, made Keith Richards’ Life one of rock’s outstanding autobiographies. James talked us through his long and distinguished career as a journalist in Africa, and as a features writer during the golden era of The Sunday Times Magazine. He described how his friendship with “Keef” was cemented by the pieces he wrote for that publication about the Rolling Stones in 1973 and 1976, answering his hosts’ questions about the great man’s rhythm guitar playing.

The fantastic Mr. Fox also offered his perspective on Little Richard, whose death last week prompted discussion of the gay black southerner’s explosive role in the birth of rock & roll. We heard a clip of the sometime Mr. Penniman speaking in 1985 – as well as one of the late Betty (‘Clean Up Woman’) Wright owning up to being a shameless show-off in 1978. James was on hand, too, to reminisce about the importance of Moe Asch’s legendary Folkways label – as revisited in the week’s new audio interview, a conversation with folk elder Pete Seeger conducted by Tony Scherman in 1987. Clips followed of Seeger talking about Asch and recalling Folkways legends Lead Belly and Woody Guthrie…

It was a hoot.

My Corona

Corona pic.jpg


It seems to render all irrelevant:

the selfishness of each of us,

the tiny hopes and dreams we held,

as if a shroud had dropped upon us all,

a leveller if ever there was levelling,

our lives on hold, the future now postponed.


Or is it only in my head? For when I step outside

the cordoned zone that is our home,

the world looks pretty much the same.

There are no bodies in the lane,

the strapping dads are pushing strollers in the park,

the planes are roaring overhead.


But sure as hell, my missus and her mate

will not be seeing Rome in May.

We may be dead by June.

More likely we will wonder at contagion,

at this tabloid Armageddon

and the rumours pushed by half-informed buffoons.


The core of all is insignificance,

irrelevance of what one’s done:

these words in notebooks, washed away and powerless

against the force of what is coming anyway.

Living for the City: Remembering Charlie Gillett, 10 years on

The Sound Of The CityMaking TracksCharlie GillettRock Files





50 YEARS AFTER his landmark Sound of the City was first published (and a decade since his death), Rock’s Backpages remembers the great Charlie Gillett: listen to Bill Brewster’s 1999 audio interview with the writer, broadcaster and label-owner, and read Alex Ogg’s long conversation with him from 2008. Plus RBP writers pay heartfelt tribute after Charlie’s passing in March 2010… mine was as follows:

NO ONE COULD overstate the importance of The Sound of the City, the first significant attempt to make sense of the tangled genealogy of American popular music. Acquired in a Pan paperback edition circa 1974, the book was my portal to the history of myriad music genres, record companies, and assorted behind-the-scenes protagonists.

I never imagined I would one day meet The Sound of the City‘s author, let alone play football with him – along with a motley band of Africans and Latin Americans – on Clapham Common. I shan’t ever forget Charlie’s lithe 60-year-old frame in those games. Though he rarely crossed the halfway line, he patrolled his defensive beat like a man half that age. Which makes it that much harder to comprehend how he has now gone: he should have lived into his nineties.

Charlie was one of the elders, a man of true integrity and unceasing curiosity. His love of soul and swamp music laid tracks for me and many others. He was so helpful and encouraging when I set to work on my first book, a study of “country soul” (the term came, ironically, from The Sound of the City). The love of southern singers and storytellers was a passion we shared for years, culminating for me in the night he brought Dan Penn, Allen Toussaint, Joe South, Guy Clark and the late Vic Chesnutt together on the same South Bank stage. When I strayed outside of that orbit he sometimes seemed nonplussed. I’m not sure he ever forgave me for sullying his “Radio Ping Pong” show with what I’m sure he heard as the antiseptic jazz-funk of Steely Dan’s ‘Babylon Sisters’.

Though Charlie’s evangelising for world music prodded me to invest in sublime albums by everyone from Youssou N’Dour to Salif Keita, I always felt slightly guilty that I hadn’t – through sheer laziness – wholly converted to the world music cause. Typically the last communication I had from him was a testy email about the long list for RBP’s best albums of the Noughties. “What an embarrassing, disgracefully white and inbred list this is,” he fulminated. “Reminds me of the NME Top 100 albums back around 1972 when only two black albums made the list. Have we really not moved on even by an inch to embrace the rest of the world?”

Thanks to you, Charlie, we have.

Neil Tennant on our podcast

Version 2

Fighting for our lives: Shoshana Zuboff’s Age


SHOSHANA ZUBOFF’S The Age of Surveillance Capitalism has followed me around for the last two months, ever since my eldest son gave me the paperback edition for Christmas.

I’m relieved to report that I have finally reached the end of its 500-plus pages (not including the even denser 130 pages of notes) and feel compelled to recommend it – more than that, to urge everyone to read it, however slowly, as an act of what Naomi Klein in her blurb called “digital self-defence”.

Subtitled The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, The Age is a truly phenomenal thing: a bible of indignant protest at the deeply sinister manoeuvres that Google, Facebook et al. have gotten away with in the last 15 years. Zuboff writes a rigorous, hypnotic, almost monotonously poetic prose that rams home the jaw-dropping infringements on not just our privacy but our human nature – hoovered up as “behavioural surplus” for Silicon Valley’s “renditions” of every move we make and every breath we take.

More than anything, the great fear is that the numbing impact of Big Tech’s “inevitablist” appropriation of our souls – and distortion of our democratic values – has been so stealthy and so uncontested that the youngest human generation will not realise their freedom has gone, allowing a new totalitarianism to take root and take control of all human life.

Reading Zuboff – a true prophet for our terrifying times – prompts me to dig up a poem I wrote almost four years ago on a trip to San Francisco: a visit on which I witnessed how the soulless geniuses of “the Valley” had destroyed the social fabric of a great American city… and how, unchallenged and unchecked, they will inevitably destroy the social fabric of human trust, reciprocity and freedom.

Zuboff deserves a medal of honour for this heroic book.




Was I ever young and thrusting?

I was young but dumb – and timid too.

I typed out words with clattering keys

before the words got processed by PCs

and all got sucked into the seas.


I have a foot stuck in the past,

the other’s stepping terrified.

A crazy scrum of lemmings on a cliff,

we drop into abysses hollowed out by billionaires

and nerds in UberCHOPPERS

scheming to replace us with machines.


We’re prey for predators, we’re tapping at our phones,

the zombie surfers of the shallow flats:

too busy sucking up the glut of pointless stuff to see

we are the product we’re consuming,

mere regurgitated selves.


And so I sit, a broken frightened man, half in, half out.

My soul’s been digitised to death,

an insect flailing in their web.


Perhaps it all will be alright:

the maniacs may yet recall

that life is flesh and feeling,

writhing mess and mass that can’t be mapped

by algorithmic fiends.

No time like the present tense: my Radiohead anthology in paperback

Radiohead for tweet

Present Tense, the Rock’s Backpages “compendium” of Radiohead interviews and reviews I assembled last year for Constable, is out today in paperback. Here’s a piece of mine that I included in the anthology, written almost 20 years ago for American GQ… just as Kid A was about to be released. I loved Radiohead then and I still love them now.

THE POSTERS on the ancient streets of Arles give little away. Sting is playing soon in Marseille. Upcoming is a “Super Big Reggae Party” with U Roy and Alpha Blondy. A bullfight will take place next week in the town’s ancient Roman amphitheatre.

Even as one approaches the equally ancient “Theatre Antique”, built during the reign of the Emperor Augustus, there’s scant indication that the most acclaimed group on Planet Pop is here, in Provence, to play its first live show in 18 months. On one side of the open-air auditorium the evening sky is charcoal-grey; from the other, bright golden light streams across crumbling columns and arches.

But now the old men promenading with their tiny dachshunds pause in their post-prandial tracks. For covering the railings encircling the theatre are sheets of black plastic; towering over the old brickwork is scaffolding that supports chunky klieg lights. Clustered about the theatre’s back entrance is a throng of polyglot youths.

A shiver of excitement ripples through the boys and girls as a slight dark figure emerges from the doorway. No satin or sunglasses on display here; not even a tattoo. Just a guy in grey New Balance sneakers, bag slung over shoulder and head tilted into a mobile phone. Voices – French, German, Dutch, English – yap at Colin Greenwood, bass player with Radiohead, as he follows the band’s producer Nigel Godrich into the sharp light. Soundcheck over, they’re heading for the band’s huge lime-green tour bus to eat dinner.

Blinking and squinting behind them comes Thom Yorke, the group’s tortured frontboy with his dabchick hair and wonky, lopsided eyes. Radiohead’s 18-date summer tour of Europe hasn’t even started, and already this most alternative of pinups looks vaguely defeated.

“Thom, Thom!”

“Thom, here, Thom!”

One particularly persistent German madchen monopolises Yorke as he tries to beat a path to the bus. He stops, poses patiently as the boys and girls capture him with tiny cameras.

And then the Creep who could be God slinks off, alone, into the sultry evening.


RADIOHEAD ARE once again setting their controls for the heart of the rock machine, heavy weights on their slender shoulders. The weight is especially heavy on Thomas Edward Yorke, 31, whose songs and lyrics and singing have made him – possibly against his own better instincts – a near-superstar.

According to Colin Greenwood, “excessive praise” for the group’s third album OK Computer “did Thom’s head in”. Now Radiohead must follow the record up, knowing that almost anything they do may disappoint profoundly. Tonight, in Arles, the world will hear the first fruits of the band’s long labours in studios in Paris, Copenhagen, and England.

To understand what’s expected of Radiohead is to acknowledge just how bankrupt “rock music” has become at the dawn of the 21st century – as a sound, as a movement, as a pseudo-religion. (“Oh no, pop is dead, long live pop,” Yorke bleated back in 1993. “It died an ugly death by back catalogue.”) Post-Cobain, R.O.C.K. has withered on the vine, discredited as a cultural force, toppled by teen pop and hip hop and even by what passes these days for “country” music. In America, Pearl Jam struggle to stay relevant; in Britain, the embers of Ladrock barely flicker as Oasis go through their death throes.

Shining like a beacon in the midst of this morass is 1997’s shimmering, densely-textured OK Computer, a masterpiece that took the moribund rock genre and resurrected it in 13 astonishing tracks built around Yorke’s soaring voice and melodies and the (multi)instrumental genius of Colin Greenwood’s kid brother Jonny. At a point when Britrock was being shored up by lumpen cool and microwaved Beatles riffs, Radiohead dared to attempt something big and brainy and unabashedly beautiful.

In so doing they kept alive a continuum that ran from U2 through R.E.M. – the ideal of polite, slightly anguished boys reaching for meaning and anthemic transcendence through guitars and amplifiers. Radiohead revived rock’s passion, its urban hymnody, recalling nothing so much as that post-punk period of rockism returned (U2, Echo & the Bunnymen, Simple Minds). Yet they also forged insistently forward, staring hard into a dystopian, over-technologised future, uninterested in peddling stadium clichés.

Significantly, the long time-lag between OK Computer and its successor – Kid A – has created a gap, a lacuna quickly filled by a spate of post-Britpop faux-Radioheads: Witness, Muse, Six By Seven, Coldplay, JJ72, Motorhomes and more. There’s a quintessential Britishness about the whole crop: the self-doubt and introversion of university-educated boys called James and Dominic hand-wringing over liquid guitars. How wonderfully earnest they are, lost in dreams of Thom Yorke’s ugly-duckling deity and Jeff Buckley’s ecstatic grace.

Like Radiohead itself, these bands are part of a growing resistance to the paralysing pop-culture irony that’s undone rock as we used to know it. Asked why people were getting so excited by his band, Coldplay singer Chris Martin offered a disarmingly simple explanation: “It’s not because of our politics or any agenda – it’s because people are looking for what’s important in music again.”

Yet right now the question is less whether the Muses and Coldplays will have any relevance once the masters return. The question is: are Radiohead themselves interested in trying to top the musical Matterhorn that is OK Computer, or are they turning defiantly away from the role of rock saviours that the world wants them to assume?


A THOM YORKE mix tape sends subterranean shockwaves through the lichen-covered granite of the Theatre Antique. (As a student, the singer was a revered turntablist at Exeter’s Lemon Grove club.) The local jeunesse dorée munch on baguettes as an evening church bell peels over mangled dance beats.

The distorted digital grooves aside, the setting for tonight’s show recalls nothing so much as Pink Floyd Live at Pompeii – or even the Grateful Dead playing the Pyramids, man. Indeed, those who decry Radiohead as ersatz prog-rockers – as too earnest, too studenty, too middle-class – will have a field day mocking the choice of unorthodox venues (piazzas, more Roman theatres) on this low-key jaunt around Europe and the Mediterranean.

Swifts and swallows dart through the heavy air as, with uncanny synchronicity, the Yorke tape gives way to the Inkspots singing ‘When the Swallows Come Back to San Juan Capistrano’. At 9.30 pm, the gathering clouds burst and rain falls from a great height onto the huddled crowd.

For a cataclysmic half-hour it looks as though we may not be hearing Radiohead after all.


AN IMAGE, frozen in pop time (or at least the early summer of 1993): a quintet of limp-haired youths unloading their “gear” from a battered van outside a venue in Clapham Junction, south London. An unmistakable pre-gig anxiety written on their support-band faces as they heave amps through the emergency exit door. One runty little dude with big peroxide-blond locks, and a glowering stringbean boy like something out of Deliverance.

The image comes to mind because Radiohead at this point were just A.N. Other post-grunge band, and a band who most decidedly hadn’t been embraced by that summer’s mushrooming “Britpop” hype. Five university-educated boys from Oxford playing sub-U2 “rock” with none of the swooning panache of Suede, Radiohead got short shrift in the cruel UK music press. At least some of the animosity came down to the entrenched anti-middle-class bias of weeklies like the NME and Melody Maker. ‘Anyone Can Play Guitar’, Yorke sneered on Radiohead’s debut album. But in Britain only the underprivileged are taken seriously as avatars of modern youth.

Somewhat drab as the debut [Pablo Honey] was, it did feature a song that put them on the map and very nearly became the albatross that finished them. A postscript to the dark abjection of grunge and its slacker offspring “losercore”, ‘Creep’ was a startling slice of self-flagellation sung in Yorke’s most putrifyingly miserablist style. “I’m a creep, I’m a weirdo,” Thommy Boy yelped; “what the hell’m I doing here?” When you saw him singing it – all spluttering rage and convulsion – the self-hate was toxic. This was a Kurt Cobain from the dank corridors of provincial English boarding schools.

That ‘Creep’ took off in, of all places, America was a double helping of irony, especially when Radiohead found themselves playing “Modern Rock” radio beach parties and Weenie Roasts. “When ‘Creep’ went through the roof, Capitol Records just wanted to milk it,” Pablo Honey‘s co-producer Paul Q. Kolderie says. “They were doing ‘I’M A CREEP’ contests and placing ads that said ‘BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD SAY RADIOHEAD DON’T SUCK.'” Although a reissued ‘Creep’ reached the UK Top 10 in the fall of 1993, American success made the British press still more suspicious of Radiohead. It also set the terms for the band’s uneasy relationship with America. On the one hand, like U2 and the Police before them, they were prepared to work hard at cracking the U.S. market, taking several support slots on tours. On the other, Thom Yorke balked strongly at the schmoozing that was expected of him.

The thorny issue of how an intelligent band retains its credibility whilst hawking its wares around the world’s pre-eminent music market is one that continues to dog Radiohead (not to mention Capitol Records) as they embark on the promotion of Kid A.


“BONSOR, tout le monde!”

Yorke’s first words immediately endear him to the dripping Arles audience as it wrings out its T-shirts. (Would Liam Gallagher have bothered with such a gesture?) Eighteen months after the group bid adieu at the Stade de Bercy in Paris, Radiohead is once again a real live entity, not simply an aggregation of website rumours.

Launching into ‘Talk Show Host’, a B-side favourite of fans-in-the-know, the band quickly makes its case. Jonny Greenwood’s keyboards swirl around drummer Phil Selway’s circular groove and rhythm guitarist Ed O’Brien’s chopped funk-rock chords as Yorke lets rip. “You want me?” he bawls in the song’s most transparent line. “Fuckin’ well come and find me!!”

The applause soaked up, the group turns to ‘Bones’, a track from their breakthrough second album The Bends. “Now I can’t climb the stairs,” Yorke howls over the churning boogie riffs. “Pieces missing everywhere/Prozac painkillers…” Jonny G is on guitar now and he’s stabbing at the strings, pulling out notes that shriek and quiver in the air.

We feel it in our dampened bones. Radiohead rocks.


THE BENDS (1995) changed everything. Recorded in a state of semi-crisis, a point when the unavoidable tensions of sustaining a band had boiled over, it steamrollered the slovenly Britpop competition of the time.

The Bends was neither an English album nor an American album,” said Paul Kolderie, who mixed the album after John Leckie (Magazine, Stone Roses et al.) had produced it. “It really had that feel of, ‘We don’t live anywhere and we don’t belong anywhere.'”

Sonically, The Bends was a far richer proposition than Pablo Honey. Here was an art-rock band unafraid of being musos. The sheer range of textures was dazzling and came with a host of other vaguely proggy signifiers: sudden time changes; string parts written by prodigy Jonny; fractured, oblique lyrics about alienation and disease.

Mix Pink Floyd with Nirvana and Jeff Buckley (who blew Radiohead away when they saw him live in London in April 1994) and you get both angst-rock (‘Just’, ‘The Bends’, ‘Black Star’) and plangent lamentation (‘High and Dry’, ‘Nice Dream’, ‘Fake Plastic Trees’). More than anything, this is where Yorke finds his voice – a voice suddenly outgrowing its Bono/Ian McCulloch origins as it built from tremulous softness to soaring intensity, supported by superhuman lungs. “[Radiohead] possess the great lyric singer of his time,” says Scott Walker, for whom the group adjusted their schedule to play the Meltdown festival in London this summer.

Radiohead weren’t the only British band shooting for something more than indie cool – both the Verve and the Manic Street Preachers wanted to make big, ecstatic music – but it was The Bends that most mocked the Blur/Oasis spat that blew up around Britpop in 1995. “The Britpop movement was wrong for us because it was so awash with this knowing irony,” remarked Jonny Greenwood. “In some ways it wasn’t about… being serious about being in a band.”

By year’s end, The Bends had put Radiohead on the world’s stage and earned them the friendship of their heroes R.E.M.. When Michael Stipe took Yorke under his wing, offering pointers on how to handle success, it was as though the older band was passing on the mantle. By 1996, when they started work on OK Computer, Radiohead had accepted that being in a rock band didn’t mean they had to behave like rock stars.

“I think what happened within the band,” John Leckie told Mac Randall, “is that they had this kind of paranoia about being polite, straight, from Oxford, never getting into any trouble or scandal, very clean, not rock’n’roll at all. That’s the way they are, and yet at the time they were worried about that, about taking on a rock’n’roll career and not being rock’n’rollers. They had to learn to be themselves and to be comfortable with that.”

As they set about recording OK Computer, Radiohead became an entity unto itself, removed from the British music scene. Unlike the majority of groups who “make it” in Britain, Radiohead did not up sticks and move to London. They remained in and around Oxford, where they’d all grown up, and knuckled down to work in their own rehearsal space near the village of Sutton Courtenay.

Opting to produce the new album themselves with the help of Bends engineer Nigel Godrich, Radiohead adopted a looser, more experimental approach to their third opus. “We weren’t listening to guitar bands, we were thoroughly ashamed of being a guitar band,” Thom Yorke admitted. “So we bought loads of keyboards and learned how to use them, and when we got bored we went back to guitars.”

The bulk of OK Computer was recorded in a spooky Elizabethan mansion belonging to ageless actress Jane Seymour. St. Catherine’s Court, outside Bath, offered the right ambience for the band’s bold new sound – an enveloping, almost symphonic montage of guitars and machines, loops and chorales. Into this big, open sound was poured all of Yorke’s obsessions with the way technology ate into people’s souls, his vocal performances comprising a single long lament for human feeling in a hyper-mediated universe. Songs like ‘Paranoid Android’ and ‘Subterranean Homesick Alien’ alternately expressed separation from society and yearning for connection.

For some, the result was a ’90s Dark Side of the Moon; for others, it was a masterpiece that blended the Byrds and the Beatles with Can and Miles Davis, a work that gave new validity to the term “concept album”. For Capitol, it came as something of a shock. Convinced they had the new U2 on their hands, the West Coast label had assumed Radiohead’s third album would be The Joshua Tree to The BendsUnforgettable Fire.

Capitol hadn’t reckoned with Radiohead’s own growing suspicion of the crude brushstrokes that stadium rock required. Even OK Computer‘s most overtly commercial track, the sublime ‘Let Down’, was all about the distrust of apparent sincerity. “We’re bombarded with sentiment, people emoting,” Yorke complained. “That’s the let-down. Feeling every emotion is fake.”

If Yorke’s postmodern malaise was a spanner in the pop works, Capitol sounded bullish after the first drooling reviews appeared. “There’s nothing I’ve seen in any country in the world that’s excited me as much,” the label’s then-president Gary Gersh told me. “Our job is just to take them as a left-of-centre band and bring the centre to them. That’s our focus, and we won’t let up until they’re the biggest band in the world.”

But did such a hoary notion mean anything anymore? Not to Radiohead, who in an earlier era might have been Pink Floyd or even the Beatles but who’d surfaced at a zeit when the geist was all about questioning and subverting the fake plastic pillars that supported the rock mythos.

In her recent book I’m a Man: Sex, Gods and Rock’n’Roll, poet Ruth Padel calls rock “a theatrical dream of being male… full of male teenage selfishness, contradiction, violence, misogyny, narcissism, supremacism, resentment, anger, darkness and fantasies of omnipotence.” For Radiohead, as for R.E.M. before them, rock has become an exhausted cartoon, an arena of empty exhibitionism.

Shattered by the OK Computer tour, which took them through to the end of 1998, Radiohead finally regrouped to begin work on a new record at the beginning of 1999. As with The Bends and OK Computer, painful false starts – this time in studios in Paris and Copenhagen – were the order of the day. Ed O’Brien’s often painfully honest “diary” on the band’s website kept fans abreast of the maddeningly uncertain process by which they were writing new material. At the root of the band’s uncertainty was a central loss of faith: the faith in rock itself.


“THIS IS a new song…”

Here are the words we’ve been waiting Thom Yorke to say all day, and now he’s said them. Tomorrow they’ll be on the Net and rock’s global villagers will be e-gabbling about “the new songs”.

Radiohead play seven new songs at the Theatre Antique, and most of them leave the crowd looking bemused. Are they songs at all? Or are they mere experiments, fragments worked up to resemble finished pieces?

‘Optimistic’ is moody and muted, as is the warmer ‘Morning Bell’, sung mainly in falsetto and arranged in 5/4 time. Neither appears to possess a chorus, and both suggest Yorke is aiming for the shapeless, post-triphop sound of ‘Rabbit in Your Headlights’, his mesmerising cameo on U.N.K.L.E.’s Psyence Fiction album. ‘Dollars and Cents’ is more spacious, opening out into long vocal lines on its chorus, but it’s hardly ‘The Tourist’. Later comes the monochordal grunge-fuzz of ‘Everyone – The National Anthem’, with Jonny Greenwood mic’ing the “found sound” of a transistor radio and the others grinding away over Phil Selway’s pounding sixteenths.

‘In Limbo’ is formless but pleasingly dreamy, with Ed O’Brien at the keyboard and Selway playing splashy jazz fills, but ‘Everything In Its Right Place’ – based around electric piano chords that sounded like old Steely Dan or Stevie Wonder outtakes – is nothing more than an ascending motif masquerading as a song. Doubtless it’s a precautionary measure to make the last new number, ‘Knives Out’, the most accessible. With Yorke strumming an acoustic and O’Brien harmonising nicely, this Smithsy item could almost be Travis.

What stirs the youth of Arles, of course, is the majestic megaballads (‘Lucky’, ‘Exit Music’, ‘No Surprises’, ‘Climbing Up The Walls’) and the post-grunge blasts of angst (‘Bones’, ‘Just’, ‘My Iron Lung’). “Oh, you know this one,” Yorke says as he introduces ‘Street Spirit’, then adds, “Phew!” “Thank you for being so nice on our first gig back,” he grunts after penultimate encore ‘Nice Dream’.

What chance a backlash when Kid A is released next month? Already knives have glinted in the British press. “Why would a band with such a rare gift for combining sonic invention with memorable, emotive songs give up half its winning formula?” asked The Observer. “Prog rock for dullards,” sneered the Guardian of Radiohead’s Meltdown appearance in July.


ON THE EVE of the Meltdown show, Thom Yorke posts a typically cryptic note on It’s a direct quote from Malcolm Lowry’s Under the Volcano and begins thus:

“Or is it because there is a path, as Blake well knew, and though I may not take it, sometimes lately in dreams I have been able to see it?… I seem to see now, between mescals, this path, and beyond it strange vistas, like visions of a new life together we might somewhere lead.”

With Kid A, Radiohead are taking the road less travelled, a winding track that makes a sharp exit off rock’s superhighway. Modern music may be about to experience its most dramatic rebirth.

King of the Weirdo Misfits: My 1993 interview with the great William Gibson

The deranged Dominic Cummings’ recent call-out for weirdos & misfits out of William Gibson novels prompted me to dig out this Vogue profile of the cyberpunk seer, whom I interviewed in Vancouver in the summer of 1993. I liked him so much, and so much of what he said in this piece was so eerily prescient – and, frankly, terrifying.